![]() |
|
|
Putting church before personal opinion, an episcopal priest guides his flock through the gay-rights storm |
|
ON THE COVER: At St. Mary's Episcopal Church in Eugene, Ore., the Rev. Ted Berktold has struggled to keep parishioners in the room as they work through their differences over the appointment of an openly gay bishop in New Hampshire. |

Walking The Talk
Facing church revolt over gay clergy, a faithful follower leads
by staying in the pews
WRITTEN BY SETH CLARK
WALKER
PHOTOGRAPHED BY JOHN LOK
THE PAIN IS palpable at
St. Mary's Episcopal Church. The Rev. Ted Berktold doesn't need a tearful
75-year-old woman in his cluttered, book-filled office to tell him that.
"This is not personal," she says, "but the Episcopal Church is no
longer my church."
"My church is leaving
me," another elderly congregant tells someone on the staff.
Berktold hasn't seen this
much turmoil in a parish since he set off his Minnesota congregation on a Sunday
morning in 1972 by wearing sandals to the pulpit and openly advocating women for
the priesthood.
This time, Berktold wasn't
even in the country when brooding trouble turned to roiling tempest. It was
August 2003, and he was on vacation when he heard that Episcopal bishops at the
church's national convention had approved the Rev. Gene Robinson's appointment
to the powerful position of bishop of New Hampshire. This was different, he
thought. Gene Robinson was openly gay and sexually active. Parish leaders can
shut out or vote out such a priest, but a bishop is nearly untouchable.
By
the time Berktold flew back home, the tempest was blowing through his church.
Two people were leaving, and more than 30 others were speaking up or threatening
to leave this diverse parish in the heart of Eugene, Ore., where university
professors mix with blue-collar immigrant workers.
Berktold had no real idea
how many others were questioning their future at St. Mary's. But he did know
that the tempest in his church was about more than just Robinson and the idea of
a gay bishop. America's latest civil-rights battle had just walked through his
front door. In the 1960s, he watched the church fracture over the issue of equal
rights for people of color. In the '70s, women's rights and the ordaining of
women caused deep divides that linger still. Now the issue of gay rights — in
particular gay rights for clergy — had become so explosive that the powerful
Archbishop Peter Akinola of Nigeria was threatening to divide the entire
Anglican Communion, the worldwide overseer of the Episcopal faith.
At the heart of the debate
for many was the idea that ordaining a gay bishop was akin to ordaining sin as a
lifestyle; depending on how it's read, the Bible denounces homosexuality at
eight different points. Leviticus in the Old Testament says a man "shall
not lie with a man as a woman: that is abomination." Sodom was destroyed,
according to some biblical scholars, because of its citizens' homosexual lusts.
Many in the U.S. Episcopal Church are not comfortable walking away from
scripture and church conventions, much less their personal views on what
constitutes proper sexual behavior.
Berktold was aware of all
this, and just as aware he couldn't solve everything. First, he thought, he
needed to keep people in the pews and keep them talking, his past experience
telling him he couldn't "preach" at people and tell them what to do.
Instead, he had to make the church a safe place for them to express their
thoughts and emotions. Only this way, he thought, could he ease some pain. And
save his church.
ON
A WARM, still August morning, parishioners at St. Mary's sit silently in dark,
wooden pews. Rays of sunlight pour red, blue and yellow through stained-glass
windows. Berktold rises from his seat in the sanctuary and walks to the pulpit
to deliver his first sermon since returning home. He knows he's going to have to
address the issue of Robinson, and he knows he has to do it carefully. He has
his own opinions, and believes that the emergence of someone like Robinson was
inevitable, that his promotion was a natural part of the church's evolution.
He's not sure it's a good thing, but he likes the fact that Robinson has moved
the discussion on gay rights and gay clergy from the theoretical to the
tangible. He also believes deeply that his own role is more pastoral than
political, and he doesn't want to lose parishioners because of his conflicted
views. What he loves about his church is its inclusiveness, tolerance and
diversity, and he isn't about to upset the balance.
Berktold begins slowly,
carefully. Above him, the ceiling in the shape of an inverted boat hull
symbolizes the ship of faith. "People don't think alike," he says
steadily. "The disciples were no different. Jesus didn't choose 12 people
who thought exactly alike, who always agreed with him. We like an idealized
image of the early church as a group with no differences, an image that makes us
feel guilty when we disagree among ourselves and with other Christian groups.
But the disciples were as diverse as they could be."
When he finishes, something
more than contemplative silence hangs in the air. There had been neither
condemnation of the gay bishop nor affirmation. In the hallway, some people are
wondering whether their church is for Robinson or against him.
ON THE DAY OF Gene
Robinson's election, Ted Berktold is in West London. Seeing the bold, three-inch
headline in The Daily Telegraph — "Can Archbishop of Canterbury Hold
Fracturing Anglican Communion Together?" — he sighs. He knows instantly
what the problem is: Robinson's impending election has been dividing the
worldwide Anglican Communion for months. "Man," Berktold says quietly
to himself, "I'm glad I'm over here."
The smart, humble son of a
Minnesota farmer, Berktold studied under renowned theologians at both the
Episcopal Divinity and Harvard Divinity schools in Cambridge, Mass. Berktold is
a think-it-through-10-times kind of guy. At St. Mary's, his parishioners and
co-workers trust his counsel, but they have learned that sometimes they have to
wait for it. This time, though, Berktold knew exactly what had to be done.
Eventually, he thought, the matter of gay clergy and gay rights within the
church would be vetted in venues like the church's national convention. In the
meantime, he just had to get through phase one: Keeping people together in the
middle of the storm.
It
would be very easy to polarize the congregation. But he'd made that mistake
before, 30 years ago, when he drove away some of his most influential
parishioners with his newly-minted Ivy League brashness. When he preached in
support of ordaining women, he hadn't listened to his parishioners or addressed
their concerns. Those who didn't agree with him were simply wrong, he thought.
Now, he knew better. The
debate is never about the debate, he thinks. The debate is about growing
comfortable with new ideas.
ACROSS TOWN, the painful
lessons Berktold had learned years ago were being repeated. His friend, the Rev.
Jeremy Tyndall, stepped in front of his conservative Episcopal congregation on
the first Sunday after Robinson's election and said, "While some are
delighted at the confirmation of Reverend Robinson, an openly gay man living
with a long-term partner, many others are feeling deep pain, including me."
Tyndall, in his native British accent, went on to say that God loves everyone,
including those with a same-sex orientation, but that to him, Robinson's
promotion felt like a Trojan horse. Hidden inside that "horse,"
Tyndall warned, could be even greater liberties for gay men and lesbians —
such as marriage.
Tyndall's congregation
applauded. It was the first time they'd ever done that. Then, nearly 10 percent
of them left.
Another local Episcopal
priest openly opposed Robinson's promotion. He lost 20 families in a matter of
months. The families went to other churches or simply quit attending church
altogether.
Robinson says he wants to be
known as a great bishop, not as the first gay one. But he also says his election
is about "the end of straight white men making all the decisions."
Berktold isn't sure of Robinson's motives, but feels he can't judge him. He,
too, has felt forbidden sexual stirrings.
In 1968, Berktold was a
fifth-year Catholic seminary student, studying in Europe for the summer. Yet
despite good grades and favor within the seminary, he was quietly considering
leaving. He'd spent his whole life dedicated to the cause, and at age 22 was
still a virgin, but the idealism of his teen years was wearing off. The policies
of the Roman Catholic Church were too rigid for him, and celibacy didn't seem
like a natural state. For the first time, he was also starting to yearn for a
family. And now, less than a year before he was due to enter the priesthood, the
guilt and the pain he'd privately harbored were starting to tear him apart.
One afternoon he and a
beautiful female exchange student headed to a beach near Athens. They spent the
afternoon napping and talking in the summer sun.
Nothing
happened that afternoon — or ever — with the pretty student. But the day
helped Berktold realize that there was no reconciling his human longings with
the celibate Catholic priesthood. There, along the Aegean Sea, he knew in his
heart he would find another religion.
ON THE PLANE back from
England, Berktold is deep in thought. He knows the call for unity has already
been made at home.
He'd instructed assistant
pastor Nick Parker and his deacon, the Rev. Nancy Muhlheim, to minister to
everyone, no matter what their needs. Muhlheim had obliged, telling the faithful
who assembled that first Sunday after Robinson's election that life in the
parish would go on pretty much as it had for the past 150 years. "The
continuity of the Episcopal denomination and its traditions does not lie in the
hands of one person, event or social issue," she said. "There are
intellectual, cultural and even religious barriers that stand in the way of
believing. The barriers are both ancient and modern. Society constantly throws
up new obstacles to our remaining faithful to the message sent by God."
Muhlheim's message had kept
things calm, for the moment. But on the plane, Berktold is thinking of the pain
and struggle yet to come. He is thinking of parishioners like Stephen Dorsey, a
64-year-old antique dealer and ex-Army intelligence officer. Known as a
thoughtful man, Dorsey endorsed the church's efforts to promote black clergy and
other minorities in the 1960s. In the '70s, he supported the ordination of
women. Today, he welcomes homosexuals in the pews — but not sexually active
ones in the pulpits.
Dorsey draws a distinction
between race and gender issues and sexual orientation because of what the Bible
says: It's not a sin to be black or a woman, but it is a sin to be gay or
lesbian and sexually active. "I'm staying for now," he would later
tell Berktold, "but the minute you have a gay priest in front of this
church, I'm outta here."
Berktold believes in
holistic interpretations of scripture, not literal ones. If he did, he'd have to
stone the adulterers and drunks — a good portion of the church, he says —
and be against women as priests. Berktold knows Robinson was elected in New
Hampshire because the people there simply like him and his work; a personal
connection was made, and parishioners moved from a place of judgment to one of
acceptance.
As for himself, Berktold
doesn't claim to know whether sexually active homosexuals are committing sin; he
sees it as a question of defining common cultural boundaries. To him, pedophiles
are acting outside those boundaries, but homosexuals are not. In any case, he
thinks it's not his place to judge them. Churches have made a business out of
judging people, he says, and that seems controlling and wrong. His job, as he
sees it, is simply to pass along the lessons of scripture and, when tough issues
arise, to encourage people to stay in the room.
As
he'd prepared for that important first sermon home, Berktold had one goal in
mind: Follow in the footsteps of Jesus. When confronted with a divisive issue,
Jesus wouldn't argue; instead he would say, "Get up and walk." Walk
'til you work it out.
BACK IN EUGENE, Berktold is
pushing toward the close of his sermon. He maintains what he calls his
"altar ego," an attitude he assumes with every sermon that puts the
church's position ahead of his own.
"Jesus didn't argue
with people," he says. "I can't think of one instance of argument in
the gospels. He answered their questions. He talked with them. He never gave up
on the Pharisees and scribes. He pointed out some glaring problems among them,
clean on the outside, but defiled within. But he never debated with anyone; he
tried to show them another way."
Berktold steps from the
pulpit and takes his seat in the sanctuary. There is the usual breaking of bread
and communion, and the service is complete. Afterward, a male parishioner
approaches.
"Ted, I've been waiting
to hear your thoughts on this matter. I guess I just heard them, huh?"
Berktold hadn't intended
that the sermon would be his final word. But suddenly, facing the question, he
decides to follow his wife's long-standing advice: Show your command of the
English language by saying nothing at all.
"Yes," he replies.
"That's all I'm going to say."
IT'S BEEN MORE than a year
since Ted Berktold last spoke of gay rights from the pulpit. He has, however,
invited some of the more concerned members of the congregation into his office
to talk, and on occasion he has shared his personal views with them in
confidence. But the decision to maintain public silence hasn't been easy: Some
see it as a back-handed affirmation of gay rights, others as a tacit rejection
of them. He is troubled that it may seem he is ignoring the real oppression and
hatred that gay and lesbian friends have experienced. He's struggled,
particularly since a diocesan convention of Oregon's Episcopal leadership in
November, when a gay priest from Portland was applauded for challenging the
group on its general silence.
Still, he remains determined
not to repeat the mistakes of the past. In the 1970s he'd only known his
congregants for six months before delivering his firebrand opinions on women's
rights. He made their spiritual home an uncomfortable place, a notion that's
antithetical to his mission as a priest. He felt particularly bad for hurting
the elderly, many of whom were what he called "innocently
conservative," holding views directly tied to their upbringing and
training.
Now, at 57, he doesn't see
people's views as "wrong" — he just sees them as their own.
Of
late, Berktold has become acutely aware of how society can inform the church.
Historically, churches have claimed to accurately inform society about right and
wrong, but when parishioners or priests become too pious, he's reminded of
Galileo's fight to prove that the sun was the center of the universe. Because
society also informed churches on women's rights, he's now interested to see how
society will judge the gay-rights issue, and whether the church will inform it
or vice-versa.
Either way, he's sure it
will happen, and perhaps soon. A woman was ordained as an Episcopal priest five
years after Berktold's tough sermon in Minnesota. In less than two years, at its
next national convention, the Episcopal Church is set to discuss and possibly
vote on the blessing of gay unions and other gay-rights issues.
Other challenges will come
first: The Anglican Communion's October 2004 Windsor Report calls on the
Episcopal Church USA to halt the blessing of same-sex unions, block the
potential consecration of openly gay clergy and express its regret for the pain
caused by the Robinson consecration. The report is fueling rumors of an official
split between the Anglican Communion and the Episcopal Church USA. Separately,
those parishes that approve of or are conducting same-sex unions are struggling
with the recent 11-state defeat of gay-marriage constitutional amendments.
Berktold's strategy is to
watch the national convention and see what happens there. In the meantime, he's
not going to hurt people or divide his congregation. He doesn't want to deceive
people about his beliefs to keep them in the pews — though keeping people in
them is certainly a goal, and one he's managed to achieve so far. But neither
does he want to be part of what he views as a dangerous and simplistic trend
toward using agenda-laden "liberal" and "conservative"
labels, especially in the pulpit. Both adults and children are better served, he
believes, by learning to stick together through difficult debate. To him, change
has already happened when the discussion begins. When God's people get up and
walk.